| 0 | 0 | 33 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为揭示砂页岩山区小流域洪水驱动下污染物的输移特征与滞后机制,本研究监测了赤水河支流七里坎小流域2025年汛期洪水事件,系统分析了氨氮(NH+_4-N)、总磷(TP)和总悬浮固体(TSS)的浓度变化及输出通量和滞后模式,并结合冗余分析识别了污染物的关键控制因子及输移路径差异。结果表明:NH+_4-N与TP的事件最大/最小浓度比值范围分别为1.3~3.0和1.3~3.8,而TSS比值达12.7~871.0,反映出颗粒物对洪水过程响应更为敏感。输移路径上,NH+_4-N部分来源于壤中流及地下水补给,浓度峰多滞后于流量峰;TP以颗粒态形式存在,受地表侵蚀作用驱动显著,浓度峰出现较早;TSS则主要受远坡及沟道等慢响应源区控制,浓度峰滞后现象最为普遍。控制因子识别表明,NH+_4-N浓度主要受降雨强度影响,TSS浓度与前期土壤含水量关联密切,其输出通量由事件历时主导。滞后特征方面,NH+_4-N和TP的滞后指数(HI)与降雨强度呈正相关,而TSS的HI及冲刷指数(FI)则与洪峰流量及前期条件呈正相关。研究结果可为砂页岩山区小流域污染防控与水环境管理提供科学依据。
Abstract:To reveal the transport characteristics and hysteresis mechanisms of pollutants driven by floods in a sandstone-shale mountainous catchment, this study monitored flood events during the 2025 wet season in the Qilikan Catchment, a tributary of the Chishui River. The variations in concentration, export fluxes, and hysteresis patterns of ammonia nitrogen(NH4~+-N), total phosphorus(TP), and total suspended solids(TSS) were systematically analyzed, and redundancy analysis was employed to identify the key controlling factors for pollutants and the differences in their transport pathways. The results show that the event-based maximum/minimum concentration ratios for NH4~+-N and TP range from 1.3 to 3.0 and 1.3 to 3.8, respectively, while that for TSS ranges from 12.7 to 871.0, reflecting that particulate matter is more sensitive to flood processes. Regarding transport pathways, NH4~+-N originates partly from interflow and groundwater recharge, with its concentration peaks generally exhibiting hysteresis relative to the flow peaks. TP, primarily in particulate form, is significantly driven by surface erosion, with its concentration peaks appearing relatively early. TSS is mainly controlled by slow-response source areas such as distant hillslopes and gullies, exhibiting the most prevalent hysteresis in sediment concentration peaks. The identification of controlling factors reveals that NH4~+-N concentration is mainly influenced by rainfall intensity, while TSS concentration is closely related to antecedent soil moisture, and its export flux is dominated by event duration. In terms of hysteresis characteristics, the hysteresis index(HI) of NH4~+-N and TP is positively correlated with rainfall intensity, whereas the HI and flushing index(FI) of TSS are positively correlated with peak flow and antecedent conditions. The research results can provide scientific evidence for pollution control and water environment management in sandstoneshale mountainous catchments.
[1]周平,汤璞,何希山,等.小流域山洪灾害预警及危险区分析[J].南昌工程学院学报,2025,44(4):14-20+49.
[2]WANG L,LI Y,WU J J,et al.Effects of the Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Soil Erosion and Nitrogen Loss on the Sloping Fields of Miyun Reservoir[J].Plants,2023,12(3):423-429.
[3]姚仕明,何子灿.长江中下游江湖演变规律及其影响效应[J].长江科学院院报,2025,42(1):1-10.
[4]SPEIR S L,ROSE L A,BLASZCZAK J R,et al.Catchment concentration–discharge relationships across temporal scales:A review[J].WIREs Water,2024,11(2):e1702.
[5]杨彩玲,胡砚霞,于兴修,等.孟良崮小流域径流与磷素传输动态关系[J].水土保持学报,2025,39(1):46-55.
[6]刘晓荣,杜新忠,刘新茹,等.典型降雨事件下流域磷流失特征与影响因素[J].长江科学院院报,2025,42(5):81-87+103.
[7]李冲,檀康达,郑文波,等.白洋淀流域厚包气带硝态氮迁移转化过程及其主控因素[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2025,33(2):314-323.
[8]杨源峰,韦慧,王建羽,等.喀斯特区两种岩性发育土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].农业现代化研究,2023,44(6):1103-1116.
[9]顾再柯,黄森,黄金权,等.赤水市大石河小流域不同土地利用类型汛期产流产沙特征[J].中国水土保持,2025(1):68-71+75.
[10]张多鹏,刘洋,李正飞,等.长江上游支流赤水河流域底栖动物物种多样性与保护对策[J].生物多样性,2023,31(8):60-72.
[11]张蒙,胡桂清,张文太,等.长期植被覆盖对紫色土坡面减流减沙能力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(5):164-172.
[12]杨晨,佘冬立,黄萱.窟野河流域次降雨事件下水沙变化特征及其输移过程[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(2):52-60.
[13]LI X,WANG J,LIN J,et al.Hysteresis analysis reveals dissolved carbon concentration-discharge relationships during and between storm events[J].Water Research,2022,226:119220.
[14]薛志春,刘绍辰,李永坤,等.永定河斋堂水库流域产流规律及前期降雨影响分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2024,60(5):625-631.
[15]史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.
[16]王正发,刘昆让,侯精明,等.不同空间尺度下径流控制率与污染物负荷削减率协同关系——以陕西省西安市西咸新区为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2025,47(3):526-536.
[17]石浩洋,杨文俊,郭辉,等.水沙调控背景下长江中游水沙变化及水体营养环境特征分析[J].中国水利,2025(21):25-31.
[18]陈咏诗,朱海,杨旭,等.沙颍河下泄污水的降解与稀释特性对西淝河取水口水质的影响[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(6):29-36.
[19]WINTER C,NGUYEN T V,MUSOLFF A,et al.Droughts can reduce the nitrogen retention capacity of catchments[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2023,27(1):303-318.
[20]邱业,曲芝旭,韩玉国,等.模拟降雨条件下肥料类型对坡面磷素流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(5):106-112.
[21]淡彩虹,许欢欢,王兵,等.模拟降雨下前期含水量对黄绵土坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):31-36.
[22]孙生龙.面向山溪性河流洪水的城镇防洪规划研究[J].水利科技与经济,2025,31(7):134-139.
[23]苏童童,阳辉,王基扬,等.我国优先流影响因素及其生态水文效应研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2025,33(11):2107-2117.
[24]赵利祥,郭忠录,聂小飞,等.极端降雨事件对南方红壤区径流和输沙的影响——基于赣江支流濂江上游流域的长序列分析(1984—2020年)[J].湖泊科学,2023,35(6):2133-2143.
[25]张昭,祝良玉,李光耀,等.表征雨水在土体裂隙内优势入渗过程的解析模型[J].岩土工程学报,2023,45(9):1831-1840.
[26]徐勤学,李洋洋,付智勇,等.西南喀斯特流域泥沙来源研究进展[J].地质学报,2025,99(11):3701-3711.
[27]王晓摇,樊秀峰,简文彬,等.碎石土细颗粒迁移特征及优先流形成路径[J].工程地质学报,2024,32(2):387-396.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X52;TV122
引用信息:
[1]黄一鸣,王志刚,王家乐,等.洪水过程下的砂页岩山区小流域污染物-水文响应规律[J].中国水利().
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(41101191)
2026-06-04
2026-06-04
2026-06-04