| 40 | 0 | 64 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以黑龙江省东北漫川漫岗国家级水土流失重点治理区和大兴安岭东麓国家级水土流失重点治理区为研究对象,基于土壤侵蚀指标探究重点小流域治理优先序。利用自然断点法,对中度及以上土壤侵蚀强度面积占比、沟壑密度、坡度大于8°面积占比以及植被覆盖率等指标分级,采用优先级等级对比的方法,在土壤侵蚀现状和水土流失潜在发展评价的双维度上,进行重点小流域治理优先序判别。结果表明,在东北漫川漫岗治理区和大兴安岭东麓治理区,治理优先序为极迫切、迫切和较迫切的小流域数量比例均近似为3:12:5;不同治理优先序小流域面积分布存在显著差异,其面积四分位距、期望和中位数均呈较迫切>迫切>极迫切分布;无论在东北漫川漫岗治理区还是大兴安岭东麓治理区,均呈现极迫切治理小流域面积占比较小,分布侵蚀沟数量占比较大,侵蚀沟沟壑密度平均值远大于迫切和较迫切治理小流域,水土保持率平均值远小于迫切和较迫切治理小流域的特征。通过治理优先序划定,为实施差别化水土流失综合治理、提升国土空间水土保持功能提供参考。
Abstract:Taking the two national key soil erosion control areas in Heilongjiang Province, namely the rolling hilly region of Northeast China and the eastern piedmont of the Greater Khingan Mountains, as study areas, this paper focused on the management priority of key small watersheds based on soil erosion indicators. Indicators including the proportion of areas with moderate and severe soil erosion, gully density, proportion of areas with slopes larger than 8°, and vegetation coverage were classifed by adopting the natural breakpoint method. From the dual dimensions of current soil erosion status and potential soil erosion risk, the priority order of key small watersheds was determined by conducting priority grade comparison. The results show that in the two studied areas, the quantitative ratio of small watersheds classifed as extremely urgent, urgent, and moderately urgent for management is approximately 3:12:5. There are signifcant differences in the area distribution of small watersheds with different management priorities. The interquartile range, expected value, and median of the watersheds all follow the order: moderately urgent > urgent > extremely urgent. In both areas, the small watersheds classifed as extremely urgent for management account for a small total area yet contain a large share of erosion gullies. Their average gully density is far higher, while the average soil and water conservation rate is considerably lower than those of small watersheds classified as urgent and moderately urgent for management. The delineation of watershed management priorities can provide theoretical reference for carrying out differentiated comprehensive soil erosion treatment and improving the soil and water conservation function of territorial space.
[1]水利部关于加强水土保持空间管控的意见[A].2024.
[2]水利部办公厅关于做好国家级水土流失重点预防区和重点治理区落地上图成果应用的通知[A].2025.
[3]王海燕,赵永军.关于水土流失重点防治区划分标准的几个技术问题探讨[J].中国水土保持,2015(12):61-63.
[4]中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.关于加强新时代水土保持工作的意见[A].2023.
[5]李姗.水利部组织完成东北黑土区侵蚀沟调查(节选)[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2023,6(8):157.
[6]李超,孙和强,侯淑艳,等.黑龙江省小流域特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2024(4):24-26.
[7]李超,孙和强,周宁,等.黑龙江省小流域划分及编码方法的研究[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2025,8(2):138-140.
[8]张宇,刘洪超,王九九,等.东北黑土区小流域综合治理分类分级标准研究[J].中国水土保持,2024(3):34-38.
[9]谭露,郑伊铃,张嫱,等.基于生态-生产-生活协同的小流域分类方法与实证[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2024,22(6):183-192.
[10]宋楠,郭俊军,李国桢.湖南省国家级水土流失重点防治区试划定探讨[J].中国水土保持,2024(10):54-58.
[11]弥智娟,姜宏雷,朱艳艳,等.岩溶石漠化区县级水土流失重点防治区划分研究[J].人民长江,2022,53(3):87-91.
[12]刘金花,郑永兴,李威,等.基于生态退化风险的国土空间生态修复区域优先序划定:以黄河流域山东段为例[J].中国环境科学,2025,45(3):1587-1600.
[13]罗志东,齐实.中国水土保持空间管理体系框架的构建[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(3):133-139.
[14]程冬兵,赵元凌,孙宝洋,等.小流域水土流失治理优先度的评价与应用[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(22):104-111.
[15]符素华,张志兰,蒋光毅,等.三峡库区水土流失综合治理优先小流域识别方法[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):79-83+197.
[16]符素华,椹卓岚,张志兰,等.水土流失综合治理优先小流域识别的空间尺度效应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):148-153.
[17]吴芳,朱源,许丁雪,等.湄公河流域土壤侵蚀空间特征及其优先治理区确定[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4761-4772.
[18]阮舒荷,庄艳华,王立辉,等.汉江中下游流域土壤侵蚀高风险期及优先控制区协同分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(6):1491-1501.
[19]王娟,刘晓林,亢庆,等.“县-小流域-图斑”多层级水土流失治理策略[J].农业工程学报,2025,41(7):136-144.
[20]张兴义,胡伟,李建业,等.水土流失防控是黑土地保护的重点[J].科学通报,2024,69(11):1401-1405.
[21]赵永军.水土保持监测形势分析与主要问题探讨[J].中国水土保持,2025(8):14-18.
[22]DB23/T 2412—2019侵蚀沟分级与分类[S].
[23]SL 653—2013小流域划分及编码规范[S].
[24]SL 190—2008土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].
[25]SL 718—2015水土流失危险程度分级标准[S].
[26]周宁,李超,吕志学,等.黑龙江省侵蚀沟水土流失治理规划及措施[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2020,3(6):158-161.
[27]王婷婷,沈海鸥,梁羽石,等.不同坡度条件下连续降雨及汇流对黑土坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2025,39(2):12-20+29.
[28]崔晓芳,刘佳悦,尹钊,等.坡度及植被盖度对潮土坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2025,53(4):117-125.
[29]海龙,樊国莉,赵亚波,等.植被覆盖和坡度对铁尾矿边坡产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(4):124-130.
[30]高燕,谢云,谢凯旋,等.东北黑土区坡耕地界定及坡度分级探索[J].中国水土保持,2024(9):46-50+79.
[31]李全峰,李吉程,于明鹏,等.黑土耕作区侵蚀沟治理紧迫度空间分布特征[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(7):1208-1219.
基本信息:
中图分类号:S157
引用信息:
[1]李超,孙和强,周宁,等.基于土壤侵蚀指标的黑龙江省重点小流域治理优先序探讨[J].中国水利,2026,No.1041(15):62-72.
基金信息:
黑龙江省水利科学研究院重点实验室开放基金资助课题(ST2024B02)
2026-08-17
2026-08-17
2026-08-17