| 161 | 1 | 753 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
2023年9月8日—13日,受台风“海葵”影响,广东省漠阳江流域遭遇特大洪水,阳江市多个乡镇和街道受灾。基于收集的气象和水文数据,结合新安江模型和MIKE 11水动力学模型,对此次洪水的成因、演进过程及防洪体系短板进行深入分析,并提出相应改进措施与建议。研究结果表明,洪水演进中,大河水库的科学调度显著缓解了下游城区的防洪压力,将接近100年一遇的洪水削减至20年一遇,最大洪峰流量减少了21.4%。调查分析显示,流域现有防洪体系存在两方面问题,一是部分堤防标准较低,二是涝区排涝能力薄弱。针对上述问题,研究提出工程措施与非工程措施相结合的综合防洪策略。工程措施方面,建议尽快推进漠阳江出海口综合整治工程,优化堤防及排涝设施,建设骨干水库调控洪水;非工程措施方面,建议加强防洪预报调度系统建设,提升洪水预测与调度能力。
Abstract:From September 8 to 13, 2023, catastrophic floods induced by Typhoon “Haikui” severely impacted the Moyang River basin in Guangdong Province, causing widespread damage in several towns and streets in Yangjiang City. Using collected meteorological and hydrological data, coupled with the Xin'anjiang model and MIKE 11hydrodynamic model, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the flood's causes, evolution process, and weaknesses in the existing flood control system. Corresponding improvement measures and suggestions are proposed.The results reveal that during the flood routing process, the scientific operation of the Dahe Reservoir significantly mitigated downstream flood pressure, reducing what would have been a 100-year flood event to a 20-year flood event. The maximum peak flow was decreased by 21.4%. However, evaluations identified two primary issues in the basin's current flood control system: low-standard embankments in certain areas and inadequate drainage capacity in flood-prone regions. To address these issues, the study proposes an integrated flood control strategy combining structural and non-structural measures. For structural measures, it is recommended to accelerate the comprehensive improvement project at the Moyang River estuary, optimize embankments and drainage infrastructure, and construct key reservoirs for flood regulation. For non-structural measures, the emphasis should be on strengthening flood forecasting and scheduling systems to enhance prediction and regulation capabilities.
[1]张建云.中国水文预报技术发展的回顾与思考[J].水科学进展,2010,21(4):435-443.
[2]刘春腊,马丽,刘卫东.洪水灾害社会经济损失评估方法研究述评[J].灾害学,2014,29(2):136-141.
[3]ZHANG H M,YANG J Y,LI L S,et al.Measuring the resilience to floods:A comparative analysis of key flood control cities in China[J].International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2021,59(4):102248.
[4]方子杰,仇群伊,陈玮.钱塘江“20200707”洪水复盘及流域防洪风险研究[J].人民长江,2022,53(11):1-7+34.
[5]钱燕,卢康明,陈学秋,等.珠江流域“2022.6”暴雨洪水复盘分析[J].中国防汛抗旱,2023,33(1):22-26.
[6]周建中,顿晓晗,张勇传.基于库容风险频率曲线的水库群联合防洪调度研究[J].水利学报,2019,50(11):1318-1325.
[7]朱红,邵茂良,徐惠平,等.流域性洪灾防范及应急处置研究--以钱塘江流域为例[J].中国防汛抗旱,2009,19(4):15-18.
[8]张善亮,严芳,方益铭,等.基于机理模型的兰江洪水复盘分析[J].水利信息化,2023(5):59-65.
[9]何晓燕,丁留谦,张忠波,等.对流域防洪联合调度的几点思考[J].中国防汛抗旱,2018,28(4):1-7.
[10]侯贵兵,王保华,黄锋,等.珠江“22·6”特大洪水水工程联合调度实践与思考[J].中国水利,2022(22):36-38.
[11]刘金涛,宋慧卿,张行南,等.新安江模型理论研究的进展与探讨[J].水文,2014,34(1):1-6.
[12]左翔,赵杏杏,叶瑞禄,等.基于改进自适应遗传算法的新安江模型参数率定研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2023(11):10-18+26.
[13]吴天蛟,杨汉波,李哲,等.基于MIKE11的三峡库区洪水演进模拟[J].水力发电学报,2014,33(2):51-57.
[14]LIANG Z M,HUANG H P,CHENG L,et al.Safety assessment for dams of the cascade reservoirs system of Lancang River in extreme situations[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2017,31(9):2459-2469.
[15]邓娟,陈国轩,陈利,等.广东省漠阳江流域大河水库洪水还原及调洪作用分析[J].中国防汛抗旱,2019,29(8):30-34.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TV87;TV122
引用信息:
[1]伍峥,黄华平,周柱伟.广东漠阳江“23·09”洪水分析与流域防洪问题思考[J].中国水利,2025,No.1003(01):27-33.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3208800)