79 | 0 | 216 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
小水电作为清洁能源在推动农村发展与减排中作用显著,但小水电开发所带来的生态影响与碳达峰、碳中和“双碳”目标下的生态治理需求存在一定矛盾。广东作为全国小水电数量最多的省份,在落实生态流量过程中,针对因电站业主主动泄放积极性不高带来的监测设备不稳定、泄放达标率低及数据准确性不高等难题,率先构建了“电价-生态流量”动态联动机制,创新出台了小水电差别化上网电价政策。该政策将小水电上网电价与生态流量泄放达标率进行关联,以市场化手段激励小水电站主动泄放生态流量。在分析该政策实施可能带来的影响及面临的问题基础上,提出了构建全链条监管体系、创新技术协同模式、健全动态评估机制的思路与对策,以确保该电价政策的顺利推行。相关内容可为小水电绿色转型提供市场化治理参考范本,对完善生态补偿政策具有重要参考价值。
Abstract:As a clean energy source, small hydropower plays a signifcant role in promoting rural development and carbon emission reduction. However, ecological issues arising from its development pose challenges to ecological governance under the dual-carbon goals. Guangdong Province, one of the largest number of small hydropower stations in China, has pioneered a dynamic linkage mechanism between electricity pricing and ecological flow management. This innovative approach addresses key challenges in ecological flow implementation, including unstable monitoring equipment, low compliance rates, and data inaccuracy caused by insufficient initiative from plant operators in water discharge. The province has introduced a differentiated feed in tariff policy that ties electricity prices to ecological flow compliance rates, using marketbased incentives to encourage proactive water discharge. On the basis of analyzing potential impacts and implementation challenges of the policy, proposing a three-pronged strategy: establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework, developing collaborative technological solutions, and improving dynamic evaluation mechanisms. The study provides a market-oriented governance model for green transition of small hydropower,offering valuable insights for refning ecological compensation policies.
[1]赵亮,高雪山,邝明勇.广东省与奥地利水电发展对比分析及思考[J].广东水利水电,2020(3):86-91.
[2]KONG Y G,KONG Z G,LIU Z Q,et al.Substituting small hydropower for fuel:The practice of China and the sustainable development[J].Renewable&Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016(65):978-991.
[3]贾建辉,陈建耀,龙晓君.水电开发对河流生态环境影响及对策的研究进展[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(2):62-69.
[4]郭文献.水电开发对长江水文生态影响研究[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2018.
[5]纪鹤鸣,何福兴,陈文科.小水电在“双碳”目标下的转型发展与创新实践[J].小水电,2024(6):7-10.
[6]刘方亮,李雪.典型国家绿色小水电发展经验启示[J].水利发展研究,2022,22(1):89-94.
[7]高晨烨,吴位表,吴瀚.基于灰色关联度的小水电生态电价核定研究--以丽水市为例[J].浙江水利科技,2022,50(4):9-13.
[8]王象链,阮伏水.福建省水电生态电价机制探索与实践[J].中国水利,2019(4):57-59.
[9]关帅,刘树锋,崔静思,等.广东省农村水电站高质量发展的问题及对策[J].广东水利水电,2022(10):102-107.
[10]杨晨.广东省农村小水电绿色发展的实践与思考[J].广东水利水电,2021(11):110-114.
[11]杨志潮,刘智,蔡嘉伟.广东省小水电生态流量监管平台的设计与实现[J].水利信息化,2023(4):88-92.
[12]苏训.珠江生态流量保障实践与思考[J].中国水利,2020(15):53-55+43.
[13]欧传奇.新时代农村水电绿色发展的思考[J].中国水能及电气化,2021(6):60-65+22.
[14]沈思敏,刘树锋,关帅,等.新时代广东省小水电可持续发展探讨[J].中国水利,2023(4):66-69.
[15]徐立尉,李强伟.小水电站生态流量泄放检查率定方法研究及实践[J].小水电,2024(6):35-39+49.
[16]吴艺涵,王煜.河流生态流量监测研究现状与展望[J].人民珠江,2022,43(5):43-49.
[17]杨绍平,李学明,牟江天,等.农村小型水电站生态流量泄放长效监管机制构建[J].四川水利,2020,41(2):130-133.
[18]莫崇勋,刘奇忠,唐玲玲,等.基于模糊-博弈-障碍综合评价模型的玉林市水资源承载力评价[J].水电能源科学,2024,42(12):50-53+161.
[19]李丽,黄伟杰,汪义杰,等.基于讨价还价博弈的流域生态补偿标准--以西江压咸补淡为例[J].桂林理工大学学报,2024,44(3):561-566.
[20]卢泉,刘雪雪,刘亮,等.基于演化博弈的新疆博斯腾湖流域生态补偿机制研究[J].人民黄河,2024,46(3):75-79.
[21]周丽娜,王初夏,肖妮,等.基于水库不同调节性能分析生态流量泄放对其发电效益的影响[J].小水电,2024(6):30-34.
[22]王霞,郑雄伟,陈志刚.浅淡生态环境用水量对坝后式水电站发电的影响[J].小水电,2012(5):11-13.
[23]何先进,郜晓辉.小水电站生态流量泄放对发电影响分析及补偿机制探讨[J].中国水能及电气化,2022(4):58-61+65.
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:TV742;F426.61;F426.91
引用信息:
[1]刘树锋,关帅,崔静思等.广东省小水电差别化上网电价政策影响分析与思考[J].中国水利,2025,No.1009(07):63-67.
基金信息:
广东省水利科技创新项目(2025-14、2025-15)