nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 10, No.1012 29-34
珠江河口滩涂资源变化及生态治理对策
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3202200)
邮箱(Email): 48708209@qq.com;
DOI:
摘要:

珠江河口是世界上最复杂的河口之一,从20世纪80年代就开始开发治理,河道采砂、滩涂围垦、水库建设等一系列活动在取得一定经济效益的同时,也给河口的自然演变带来影响。通过对21世纪以来珠江河口水沙情势及滩涂变化情况进行系统梳理,阐明了当前河口来沙骤减、河口湾滩槽失稳、滩涂生境破碎的形势,从而进一步指出珠江河口滩涂存在生态损害、生物多样性脆弱、盐水入侵加剧、生物生境变化等生境修复问题,提出通过加强珠江河口岸线滩涂保育、推进硬质化海堤生态改造、促进河口湿地生态系统恢复、加快磨刀门拦门沙生态修复、维持伶仃洋中滩稳定的自适应修复等措施,加快河口受损滩涂生态修复,构建更有利于河口生物的生境。

Abstract:

The Pearl River Estuary, recognized as one of the most complex estuarine systems globally,has undergone extensive development and management since the 1980s. Activities such as channel sand mining, mudflat reclamation, and reservoir construction have yielded economic benefits but have also significantly influenced the estuary's natural evolution. A systematic review of water and sediment dynamics and mudflat changes since the 21st century reveals a sharp decline in sediment inflow, instability in bay shoals and troughs, and fragmentation of mudflat habitats. These conditions have led to ecological degradation, weakened biodiversity, intensified saltwater intrusion, and alterations in biological habitats.To address these challenges, measures are proposed to accelerate the ecological restoration of damaged mudflats, including strengthening shoreline and mudflat conservation, promoting ecological transformation of hardened seawalls, restoring estuarine wetland ecosystems, expediting the ecological rehabilitation of the Modaomen mouth bar, and maintaining the stability of the Lingdingyang middle shoal through adaptive restoration.

参考文献

[1] DYER K R,CHRISTIE M C,WRIGHT E W.The classification of intertidal mudflats[J].Continental Shelf Research,2000,20(11):1039-1060.

[2] WEI W,DAI Z J,MEIX F,et al. Shoal morphodynamics of the Changjiang(Yangtze)estuary:Influences from river damming,estuarine hydraulic engineering and reclamation projects[J].Marine geology,2017(386):32-43.

[3] SYVITSKI J P M,VOROSMARTY C J,KETTNER A J,et al.Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean[J].Science,2005,308(5720):376-380.

[4] GASSER M M,ELGAMAL F.Aswan High Dam:Lessons learnt and on-going research[J]. International water power&dam construction,1994,46(1):35-39.

[5] KESEL R H.Human modifications to the sediment regime of the Lower Mississippi River flood plain[J].Geomorphology,2003,56(3):325-334.

[6] ANTOINE C,JULIEN D,ROBERT L,et al.Morphological responses of an estuarine intertidal mudflat to constructions since 1978 to 2005:The Seine estuary(France)[J].Geomorphology,2008,104(3):165-174.

[7]何青,朱春燕,郭磊城,等.变化条件下长江口沉积地貌系统转型与应对[J].中国水利,2024(16):12-19.

[8] MUHAR S,SCHMUTZ S,JUNGWIRTH M.River restoration concepts——goals and perspectives[J].Hydrobiologia,1995,303(3):183-194.

[9]徐彩瑶,濮励杰,朱明.沿海滩涂围垦对生态环境的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):1148-1162.

[10] NATALIE M F,MALCOLM D H,SIMON B,et al.Intertidal mudflat and saltmarsh conservation and sustainable use in the UK:A review[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2013(126):96-104.

[11]赖永辉,谈广鸣,曹志先.河道采砂对河流河道演变及人类生产活动影响研究述评[J].泥沙研究,2008(6):74-80.

[12]黄镇国,张伟强.珠江河口近期演变与滩涂资源[J].热带地理,2004(2):97-102.

[13]梁向阳,梁家海,萧金文.珠江三角洲海岸变迁及对城市可持续发展的影响[J].资源调查与环境,2005(4):283-291.

[14]戴仕宝,杨世伦,蔡爱民.51年来珠江流域输沙量的变化[J].地理学报,2007(5):545-554.

[15]黄伟杰,王建国,陈文龙,等.珠江河口生境演变与生物变化趋势[J].中国水利,2023(22):16-21.

[16]黄少峰,刘玉,李策,等.珠江口滩涂围垦对大型底栖动物群落的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(4):499-503.

[17]袁菲,胡晓张,喻丰华,等.珠江河口水沙控导关键问题研究与思考[J].中国水利,2025(6):38-42.

[18]刘培,许劼婧,何用,等.新世纪以来珠江河口滩涂演变及保护对策探讨[J].泥沙研究,2024,49(5):66-73.

[19]陈文龙.珠江河口治理与大湾区水安全保障战略研究[J].中国水利,2022(22):17-20.

[20]何用,吴尧,卢陈.珠江河口演变与治理保护探讨[J].泥沙研究,2022,47(6):1-8.

[21]陈文龙,刘培,陈军.珠江河口治理与保护思考[J].中国水利,2020(20):36-39.

[22]陆永军,侯庆志,陆彦,等.河口海岸滩涂开发治理与管理研究进展[J].水利水运工程学报,2011(4):1-12.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:X171.4;P748

引用信息:

[1]袁菲,陈文龙,李丽等.珠江河口滩涂资源变化及生态治理对策[J].中国水利,2025,No.1012(10):29-34.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3202200)

检 索 高级检索